I have tried for a few days now to write about what’s been happening in Oregon… About the double standard there is when white people with guns demand justice. But really, that can pretty much be summed up with one awesome tweet:
I imagined what would happen if Black Lives Matter protesters–fed up with the injustice of government officers being able to kill unarmed black people with impunity–decided to abandon their non-violent stance, get some guns, and “occupy” a federal building. I imagined what would happen if a group of Muslims–fed up with being racially profiled, while this country’s political leaders demonize them and threaten to ban Muslims from entering the country–decided to take up arms, marched through the streets, set up in a wildlife refuge’s gift shop while saying they are “willing to kill and be killed” if anyone attempts to remove them by force. It’s not hard to imagine a scenario where both of those groups would already be dead by now.
There’s just so much hypocrisy in this story. Like the irony of anti-federalists asking people to send them socks and snacks. And how are those supplies going to GET there… Through the MAIL? On ROADS?
It’s just dripping with irony… Take for example how this whole protest is over land rights, but the land they are on right now was taken by force 137 years ago (almost to the day) by a different group of armed white men… Taken away from the Native American Paiute Tribe. Though at the time that those indigenous people were marched off the land in shackles, instead of being known as the “Malheur National Wildlife Refuge,” it was just known as the “Malheur Reservation.” You can READ ABOUT IT HERE. Don’t worry, though, it all turned out okay for the Paiutes… 50 years later, they were given 10 acres of land that used to be a garbage dump.
But if you’re not seeing all the glaring double standards, you’re either not looking, or you’re one of the millions of people who are–for some reason–incapable of seeing hypocrisy and injustice when it is applied to groups other than the one with which you identify. For example, when protesters (the UNARMED variety) showed up up in Ferguson to protest the killing of Michael Brown and the refusal to indict the officer who killed him, not only was the National Guard was called out, but the police showed up looking like extras for The Matrix Trilogy. In case you forgot, here are a couple of pictures that might help jog your memory…
This was the turnout for UNARMED protesters who were gathering in a public space. The people who are “protesting” in Oregon right now are a group of heavily-armed, anti-federalist radicals who are talking about being prepared to kill people and making tear-filled, Al Qaeda-esqe martyr videos for their families to watch after they are dead (This particular one made by an unhinged, anti-Muslim white supremacist).
But again–just like with so many issues–either the double standard is so clear to you that it’s difficult to imagine how a person could NOT see it, or none of this stuff seems even remotely hypocritical or unreasonable. It doesn’t do any good for either side to sit and write about how stupid the other side is. There is more than enough “I’m right, and you’re stupid” in the world to go around without adding to it… So today I’m trying to write about the thing that’s BEHIND the thing that’s behind the thing that separates us so well. And here’s the best I can figure: It’s God.
And so, if you know anything about me, you already know that I don’t believe God is the cause of the problems in the world (though, with all of the crap in the world that is credited to belief in God, it’s easy to see how more and more people could come to the conclusion that the world would be better off if we were all atheists). The problem is a specific BRAND of God… It’s the god who hates. The god who hates his enemies. The god who hates everyone except for your group. The god who hates all the same people that you hate. The god who damns to burn in hell everyone who doesn’t believe the same things that you believe. This “god who hates” is the common denominator.
But it’s more than that… There is a rigid and frightening Certainty to their beliefs that seems like the foundation that this counterfeit god is built on. It’s a startling lack of humility that breeds Fundamentalism. And please don’t hear me saying “conservatism” or “republicanism.” This is no more “republicanism taken to its logical end” than the Westboro Baptist Church is “Christianity taken to its logical end.” It is an Extremist ideology of fundamentalism that is deeply rooted in an “Us-Versus-Them” Tribalism and an inability to see shades of grey in what appears to be a very Black & White world. It is characterized by a suspicious Anti-Intellectualism and a mistrust of any institutions (The guys leading this standoff happen to be Mormons… Not that it matters much–A paranoid fundamentalist extremism transcends religious boundaries). Many of these people are convinced that they Hear From God in very specific fashion, and they treat the word “belief” and the word “certainty” as synonyms. In these sorts of groups, people who are unsure must not be a “true believers,” and they are pushed away from the group. And when Belief that something is “God’s will” transforms into Certainty that something is “God’s will,” things can get very Dangerous, very fast.
It isn’t surprising that the fundamentalism that pervades so many folks’ religious ideologies would lend itself to a fundamentalism in a nationalistic ideology. The inability to allow for different interpretations in scripture is the same deficiency that is brought to the reading of the Constitution. Next thing you know, you’ve got these “Oath Keepers” and “3 Percenters” who look at a different interpretation of the constitution the same way that they look at a different interpretation of the Bible… Heresy. Maybe even acts of war. Next thing you know, we have people who are looking at Timothy McVeigh as a hero. We have people pledging to protect the Constitution, but not understanding that that same Constitution allows for changes to and interpretation of that document. It not only allows for it… It REQUIRES interpretation. And without that basic understanding, something like a change to our gun laws, or granting the right to marry to same-sex couples… These things can feel like more than just a different interpretation–They feel like an attack on the Constitution, an attack on God, and (maybe most frighteningly for some) an attack of the feeling of safety that comes with being certain of everything.
A lot of people seem to be taking an “Ignore-them-and-they’ll-go-away” stance for these people, but personally, I think it’s much more serious than that. Many of these people want another Ruby Ridge or another Waco. They WANT something to happen— Not only to validate their paranoia and prove the prophecy they are working so hard to fulfill, but to hopefully ignite a spark that will start a war. Incidentally, this was the same hope for the Oklahoma City bombing that killed 168 people and injured over 600–the biggest act of domestic terrorism our country has ever seen. Hopefully, it won’t come to people losing their lives over fundamentalism, misplaced certainty, and a belief in the god who hates… But all over the world we see evidence to the contrary. There are people in this country with stockpiles of guns and “Go-Bags” ready to start fighting. People want to believe we’re “smarter than that,” but here’s the reality: We are no more rational than the parts of the world that have managed to produced the kind of terrifying certainty of ISIS… We just speak a different language, salute a different flag, and call our god who hates by a different name.
So that’s a pretty big problem… But what’s the solution? I continue to believe that only way to counter the ideology of the god who hates is to proclaim to the world the reality of The God Who Loves. The God who loves “them” every bit as much as God loves “us.” The God who loves us all, regardless of national borders. The God who loves us all, despite how “right” or “wrong” our theology is. The God who loves his enemies, and calls us to do the same. The God who calls us to be hopeful, even when hope seems foolish. The God who loves the whole world… even these misguided jackasses in Oregon (and, as a side note, Oregon has an incredibly racist past that you can READ ABOUT HERE. The picture below was taken at a 2008 political rally. In Portland. FOR OBAMA! You can imagine the white out conditions in rural parts of the state).
The way out of this is to rid ourselves of the lines that divide us. Many of us are witnessing the dissolving of boundaries in our own lives, and where boundaries start to fade, things get less and less certain. But there remain many people in the world right now who crave that certainty, and every dissolving boundary is met with fear and anger. People feel like they NEED their religious boundaries, their geographical boundaries, their “Us-Versus-Them,” their tribes… So if our reaction to that fear and anger is to set up yet another boundary between “us” and “them,” it only works to reinforce an ideology of separation. That separation is a sickness, and the only remedy is to proclaim a different God… The God who binds us all together. The God who inspires us to love their kids every bit as much as our own kids. The God who dissolves boundaries. The God who stirs our hearts to declare to the world that we are all on the same team–That we are all one–That either we all win, or none of us win… Until “the god who hates” seems like a distant memory… and a logical impossibility.
Once again, my Patrons are the best. Today I’d like to say a special thank you to Beverly Cook. It’s no surprise to me that most of the people pledging at the “Get a picture of me mowing the lawn with my shirt off” level are women.
I’m so joking, obviously… My torso looks like a whistling gorilla. Thanks again for all of your support!
Your cousin-in-law? Rob Alderink sent me your post and we’ve been discussing it today.
I thought it may be helpful for you to know that I’m a “the bible is the very inherent word of God” believing, Fundamentalist, Evangelical, white, male, privileged, 7 point Calvinist, complimentarian, baptist, believer in Jesus and the only way, truth and life, who thinks that words have meaning that CAN & SHOULD very closely be approximated to the degree that the document being approximated has importance… WHO, would never kill a person because their interpretation of scripture differs than mine, but would die on issues of the Gospel if needs be.
We’re out there 😉
Very nice. Wish more people would actually read an article like this. So tired of the division, polarization, focusing on differences rather than building bridges. Thanks for voicing what many of us believe.
Jono, I thank you for speaking up for peaceful ways. I am curious though, what kind of situation do you think would require you to die on issues of the Gospel? I am not sure what you mean by that.
Thanks in advance for your response.
These 2 books have many, many examples of what I’m talking about when I say that I’d die on issues of the Gospel if needs be.
Hi James, I tried to reply, but I think the Boeskool has his spam settings such that the links to the 2 books I mentioned prevented the comment from showing up…
Anyways, what I wrote was: These 2 books have many, many examples of the Gospel issues that I would die for and examples of people who actually have…
“Fox’s Book of Martyrs” & “By Their Blood: Christian Martyrs of the Twentieth Century”
Both are very good and both are very inexpensive on Amazon.
“…things get less and less certain. But there remain many people in the world right now who crave that certainty…”
“… and the only remedy is to proclaim a different God… The God who binds us all together.”
Meaning, Boeskool, that your own “certainty” lies in a universal belief in your own brand of “God”, a version whom you conceive will remedy humanity’s pain by being a god of “bond” not “separation”.
I sense your sincerity and your heartbreak…I agree with your pronouncement concerning the blatant hypocrisy…I agree with your assessment that religious fundamentalism separates peoples…but, I think you fail to realize that, by yourself holding any belief in the even the existence of any “god” without objective proof, even your own version of faith feeds and encourages humans’ insistence on having a “god” to look to, worship towards, follow after, hope in, lean upon, trust on, and/or live-and-die for. By believing in any “god'”, without having rational basis and objective proof such “god” even exists, you unwittingly add yet-another log to humanity’s inferno of religious divisiveness.
I can’t truly agree that religion divides people. Doctrine might but people are capable of choosing to love beyond their differences. Some may engulf themselves in false doctrines that convince them to hate others but that, in itself, is also a choice. A love that binds people together in unity is a choice. It’s also the same thing Jesus preached.
I’ve experienced that words can have diverse meanings to different people, and that unawareness of such diversity can cause misunderstanding and misconception during communication and within discussion.
Would you, therefore, define your meanings of the words 1) religion, 2) doctrine, 3) hate, 4) and love? (The last word, “love”, provides a good example of why it becomes essential to understand each other’s definitions: for, in your 9:07 PM Jan 7 post on this thread, you wrote, “I love this…I love this on so many levels…”; are you therefore defining that “love” as the same “love'” you mean in “…choosing to love beyond their differences…A love that binds…”?)
Also…from where and/or from what source do you obtain your information concerning what “Jesus preached”?
I love this. I wish I had some more articulate or well thought comment in response to such a well written article, but all I can really say is that I love this on so many levels.
Thanks dude. Truly.
Pingback: You Have Every Right To Say Racist Things | The Boeskool
“Fear of man is a great snare and it traps millions daily, but love for the praise of men is equally dangerous and is perhaps more subtle and deceiving. The Pharisees of the N.T. were the kind that loved the praise of men more than the praise of God. It caused them to be bitterly opposed to Christ and the spirit of utter unselfishness that He manifested in all things. When one does anything to be seen of men or to receive any praise of men he has a full reward and will have none in the next life”. [Dake’s Annotated Reference Bible]